You are currently browsing the monthly archive for October 2008.
Why? Because I can’t sleep. Why? Because I was having one of those dreams where you do the same simple thing over and over.
Sometimes my brain does this because it hates me and it wants me to die. Today it did it because I was worrying at this thing. Let me explain the situation (I swear, it’s relevant. I think. I mean, it is 5.30)
It’s pretty simple, when isolated. I was making a flyer for a male colleague. I made the flyer. There was some to-ing and fro-ing, but nothing unusual. The time came to send the flyer out electronically. I’ve built it in Illustrator, and I’ve used a couple of fancy fonts – our standard fancy font and another one specifically requested. This means that I can’t just pdf the sucker, because, because of the complicated nature of copyright (go read BoingBoing or something, if you are confused about this. And want to be more confused. And then angry. And then confused again… maybe don’t read BoingBoing.) the fonts can’t be packaged. Thismeans that if I pdf it as is, and you don’t have Frutiger and DIN light on your computer, you won’t be able to read it properly at worst, at best it will not look the way it is intended. (Frutiger is ok, it usually just defaults to arial. Some fonts will turn up as gibberish, though.)
So, ok, I do the usual, I convert type to outlines, which means making the computer think it’s a shape, not a font. This is great, but it also means, for most san serif fonts (and Frutiger especially), that the lowercase ‘l’s will all lookkind of bold. It’s a thing. No way around it.
So, I send it off to Male Colleague. He comes in: the ‘l’s look funny. I explain why. He expresses his unhappiness at this fact. I tell him I can send him the not-outline one for internal use (most of us have Frutiger, it’s our official font. Just to make life easier for everyone, we picked a stupid one) but that if he sends it out, a lot of people won’t be able to see it properly. He likes this. I send it to him.
He sends that one out as the official flyer.
A female colleague at another site who works on approvals, and with whom I often discuss such things, puts it into Illustrator again, makes it outlines, and resends it out, with a friendly note to me pointing out that I probably should do that, next time, so that everyone can read it properly.
I was disproportionately upset about this. Part of it is the context of the last couple of weeks – Thursday and friday everythingI did just seemed to be a little bit wrong. You know? Nothing big, just little, niggly, stupid mistakes. And a similar thing had happened earlier on this flyer (I suggested a design tie-in, Male Colleague didn’t want to go in that direction, I did the flyer, Female Colleague pointed out that a design tie in would have been nice, MC had no memory of the conversation I had had with him about it).
And I am getting really, really tired of being treated like a retard. And I am even more sick of being one.
This is what I woke up at 4am thinking about.
I know, it’s not even that big of a deal. Except it is. In my head, this is how it goes:
MC: There’s a problem.
Me: <explains problem and why it can’t be fixed the way he wants it fixed>
MC: I’m not really sure that you know what you are talking about.
Me: Hmmm, me either.
Me again: Maybe I don’t know what I’m doing. <Does something that proves this. The other way, though>
FC: Um. Are you sure you know what you’re doing?
So, yesterday I was angry at him for not listening, for making it look like I made a rookie mistake…
Until I realised (at 4am, did I mention that?) that I had made a rookie mistake.
If I had forgotten to do this, I would be angry at myself. I should know better than to have let him have the not-outlined copy. It shouldn’t have even occured to me as an option. So why did it?
Partly because of our relationship and dynamic. Partly because of the day I was having(busy). Partly because of the week I was having (busy – the same reason for the stupid mistakes last week). Partly because I wanted him to go away and let me get on with other things – I was finished with this flyer, already!Partly because I didn’t go to design school for three years and sometimes I still feel like a bit of a fraud in this job (which I am NOT. Doesn’t help with the feeling, though, knowing that).
It didn’t even occur to me that gender roles might have played a part. But I think they might have.
Not a big part. But a crucial one. An unconscious one. One that made it ok for him to think that maybe he knew more than me about my job, and for me to think that too.
To put this in perspective, our site boss asked about the same thing the other day, I explained it and she said ‘ok, it’s not a big deal, then’.
Now, the place I work has a very high female:male ratio. It is very privilege-aware. So is this particular male colleague. I am definitely not calling him a sexist pig here. that is plain not true, and he would be offended by it – rightly so. Actually, he was offended the other day when I pointed out that he is part of the Patriarchy (ain’t we all.)
One of his things in Narrative Therapy, and I wanted to know a bit about it, so he had recommended some books from our library for me. And I stared reading one, and I found this bit.
[F]eminists have demonstrated how patriarchal attitudes permeate social institutions and popular thought, and how these assumptions lead to injustice. As a result, in some social circles traditional narratives about the ‘essential’ – and subordinate – nature of women are no longer taken seriously, although I believe that these ideas are often demonstrated by those of us men who think of ourselves as liberal…. I imagine that few counsellors of any persuasion agree with male chauvinist, racist or similar beliefs, but the emphasis in narrative therapy on the need for continual vigilance against their more subtle manifestations is particularly emphatic. White* values feminist analysis of the patriarchal assumptions embedded in established psychologies, and acknowledges that feminists have alerted him to subtle ways in which sexism and chauvinism may be demonstrated by male therapists through vocal tone, dominance of conversation, marginalization through vocabulary choice, unverified assumed capacity for empathy, and assumed cultural and gender norms. White insists that these manifestations are impossible to avoid altogetherbecause male therapists live in a culture in which those attitudes are embedded. However, he believes that by critical self-monitoring and regular checkingout with persons**, therapists may go some way towards minimizing these factors, and that to do so is a moral obligation.
(Payne, M (2006) Narrative Therapy second edition, Sage publications, page 22 emphasis added)
*this is Michael White, co-founder/inventer/whatever of Narrative Therapy, and my fellow Adelaidean – well, until he died earlier this year. An unfortunate name in the circumstances, perhaps
** their term for ‘clients’
I tagged it, because the MC in question in this story sometimessays stuff that I know he thinks is joking, but… sort of isn’t, really. I mean, he means it to be. But this privilegething… It’s insidious, you know? In fact, about 5 pages later, after that quote, the author does it himself. He gives four examples of people struggling with ‘thin’ narratives of their lives (society telling them they are no good, essentially). One of them is a primary-school aged boy. The other three are female. Why? I don’t know. I’m pretty sure the author didn’t mean to make it look like only women and children have these problems (classic Victorian strategy. The era, not the place. Although…) And when I pointed it out to MC, he protested along these lines – of course it’s not intentional, it’s not a big deal, don’t be silly, etc etc.
But that’s not the point. The point is, that privilege is SNEAKY! It gets us coming and going. We don’t mean to show it, but with subtle language choices, with body language, with all kinds of non-conscious clues and hints, we reinforce it – both the privileged and the un-privileged reinforce it for each other, ourselves and those around us. It’s not just the men who live in the culture that feeds them assumptions about women – women live in it too, we breathe it in every day. You can’t avoid absorbing some of it. Why do you think things like sexualised dolls are such a big deal, why capital F feminists object to sexy video clips. It’s not the things themselves, it’s the ripples they leave in people’s self-stories, in their sub conscious, in their innate awareness of how to be and act, what’s acceptable and what’s not, what’s normal.
That’s why it’s important to have real diversity – not just token ‘others’. I go past a school every day on the way to work, with a mural out the front that the kids have done themselves. It shows kids playing. All the ‘normal’ looking kids are clearly boys, through my cultural eyes. All the figures that are girls are exaggerated – huge pigtails, big lips, eyelashes, etc. What does that tell those girls, every day, without them knowing? That to be noticed, to be a girl, they have to be exaggeratedly feminine, to be over the top. They can’t just be ‘normal’ – only boys are normal. to be a good, proper part of our society, they need to change their behaviour, their appearance and themselves.
And I think that’s part of what happened to me yesterday. I bought into someone else’s privilege. He wasn’t trying to make me. But we were part of a societal script.
The thing is, that there’s no point to all of this. I mean, essentially, so what? What is the big freaking deal? It was a tiny incident, and I’m way over exaggerating it. And even if it is about gender, It doesn’t matter. It is almost as bad to always make it about gender (or whatever) as to never make it about that. I am positive that gender played some sort of role in this. But it shouldn’t have. And that it did is as much his fault as mine, since we both bought into it as much. Me maybe more: I should have pushed back. If i am the strong woman that I like to pretend I am, I should act like it, I should work on myself to make sure that Idon’t buy into those cultural norms – if I’m doing it to myself, who ese am I doing it to? And how can I expect others to self-examine if I won’t?
I am not sure if this was just a thinly veiled excuse to blog about what woke me up, or to make it seem more important or more glorified. I do know that this incident and my own problems with gender are insignificant in the scheme not only of the world, but of my own life. Comfortable middle-class existence, and all that. I am thankful for that.
But it has made me think about the way I relate to privilege.
White woman, like men of colour, have a special advantage if only we will use it. We get to see privilege from both sides. We get to see it interacting in complicated ways. We get to examine our own position to privilege, our owning of it and our lacking of it. How it helps us and how it trips us. How we can use it against someone else without even meaning to. How what we think are innocent words and actions can hurt other people directly and indirectly. It’s precisely the small nature of this incident that highlights to me how important this is – even here, my workplace that I consider one of the most fair and considerate places in the world, this tripped me up. I had to argue with MC for about three minutes before he accepted that there even might be something wrong with all those earlier examples being female or children. (btw, am I overreacting on this one? Input appreciated)
It’s hard to step out of things and see it. And sometimes, like this time, it’s not even a big player in the situation. Other, more specific things, require our attention and deserve their own weight. It needs to be more about the personal relationships than the gender ones, for example.
That doesn’t mean that the privilege isn’t there. And that it isn’t harmful. Sneaky bastard.
I was thinking about my blog post last night, and I realised I might have been a little rude. You see, I made a throw away comment about God (“Dear ridiculous-father-figure-deity-in-the-sky”). And I was thinking about it and I realised that Science Girl, who tagged me for that meme in the first place, is religious. Has faith. Whatever, however you want to put it. I don’t know what she believes or how, but I know that God is someone important to her and her life. I wouldn’t worry too much excpet that we’ve only just stumbled accross each other in blogland, and without any context it looks pretty rude and disrespectful.
So instead of a babbling apology or running back the other way, which would mean nothing and also not be true to my own beliefs and whatever, I thought I’d do ‘6 things you don’t know about me: the religion edition’. Here goes:
1. I was brought up Catholic. Both sides of my family are good Irish Catholics going way back. My parents were sort of hippies, in that churchy way. They were involved in the rock mass congregation when that started. I don’t know if they knew Sister Janet Meador not. Must find that out. (Great, now I have the Lord’s Prayer in song stuck in my head.) My year 8 Music teacher was one of the people who wrote the rock mass. He left halfway through that year to go to a more progressive school. He was awesome.
2. My high school was a Mercy school (not the one linked to in Adelaide in that article). I had pretty much lost most of my faith before I hit high school, but I still have a lot of respect for the Mercy sisters. They had chutzpah. And did truly good works. There weren’t many nuns left at the school by the time I got there (there are none now, the convent is used as classrooms. Although there are a couple who come in and help with special needs kids) but the ones we had contact with were great. They were kind and nice but still real human beings, you know?
3. I hate the new pope. I miss John Paul II. He was the pope all my life, and even though I didn’t believe in his religion by the time he died, he was my pope. He got a lot of stuff wrong, in my opinion, but he got the essential humanity right, something I think that Pope Benedict could learn from.
4. I had my first communion late because about the time I was supposed to start it, I watched a documentary about the human body. My family were pretty science-and-knowledge focused, and documentaries were something we would all gather around and watch. When I was in China, I bought all the David Attenborough DVDs I could find, because they were a comfort thing. Anyway. I watched the bit about how babies are made, and I remember the picture in my head, it was one of those teeny cameras and it was of a woman’s fallopian tubes, and then there were similar shots of an embryo. And I remember thinking ‘wait a second. That’s not what they said!’
See, parish politics was complicated in the Adelaide hills. The small town we were in had a reasonably progressive congregation – or at least very lassaiz faire. And the parish priest when I was growing up was reallytouchy feely. But the because of low numbers, it was a big parish, and the main base of it was in a pretty conservative town, and they got to teach the kids, see. So what they were saying was pretty dumbed down and also really old fashioned. While I, at home, was always encouraged to think for myself and make connections and was often told the complicated version, at church they would say ‘God made each and every one of us’ which seemed a little inefficient, at the time (I also thought that heaven was underground. mean, it made sense. You get buried, not shot up in the air, so it just seemed logical).
So, I was conflicted about it, the two stories, biological and spiritual, didn’t seem to gel. My parents, to their very great credit, answered every question I had and said that I didn’t have to take any sacraments until I was sure I wanted to. I ended up taking it two years later, and I can’t say it was a great experience – I had to go to lessons at another church, because there were only about two of us at ours, and the teacher was not very child-friendly.
5. Sometimes I think that being a lapsed Catholic is just as much of a religion as being a Catholic. I still have a relationship with God – it’s just that ‘God’ is a voice in my head, not in the great beyond, and it’s a pretty quiet voice these days. I used to envy people who had faith. It seems easier, somehow, and how comforting would it be to know someone has things down, no matter how bad it might look for you personally or the world in general. Someone is in charge. And I still believe, have to believe, that there is some kind of natural order, there are rules and patterns mysterious and grand enough to be considered ‘divine’ (whatever that would mean to our mortal brains). But I don’t, I can’t, believe that that comes from some beardy guy lying on a cloud. I know that’s oversimpifying thousands of years of complicated philosophy but still…
Also, once you study European history, you realise how much of what us Westeners believe to be the Word of God is just tradition, or work arounds, or political manouvers. That’s not to undermine the essential message(s) of the bible – but isn’t that the point? That the messages don’t need the particulars to be true?
Anyway, back to being a lapsed Catholic. I still have an ambivalent relationship with the whole religion thing, and I still have a really ambivalent relationship with Guilt. I can wrap myself up in a really good guilt trip pretty easily. As a result, I’ve learnt to ignore it. It’s a pretty useless emotion. I mean, either don’t do it, or don’t feel guilty about it. But I have to wonder what that does to the way I relate to the rest of the world – I know it makes me seem harder, and maybe it makes me actually harder, too.
Even when I couldn’t face the idea of going to church anymore, I still knew it was useful. I mean, an hour a week where you reflect on life and morality and how to be good? I think everyone could use that. And I try to squeeze something like that out of every week, but it’s hard when it’s not ritualised. It’s much harder to be a good person by yourself than with God at your back. Although maybe not, looking at some people who think they have God at their back.
6. I still think Jesus would be a Dude. I would totally love to hang out with him.
I am feeling a bit swamped with the knits at the moment. I have too many things on the go, too many things I want to do, too many things that are halfway through and no end in sight, and have reached the fiddly bits, so that they’re hard to take places.
This weekend I have had people over every night at my new house. This was sometimes pleasant, but made me a bit cranky this end of the week, since I feel like I haven’t done anything – nothing around the house, nothing on my knitting, and the headway I’d started to make on my podcasts (down to 5.5 days of audio in my podcast playlist! Yay!) is loosing ground. In fact, I feel like the unpacking and sorting is going backwards, since I cleared out the second bedroom last night so that my sister’s stuff could start being moved in before she herself moves. This is a Good Thing, as it means that I don’t get used to using it as a dumping ground, and it feels more like a two person house, which is something I want to maintain so I don’t get a rude shock. But it also means that there are books in piles in the living room, and DVDs in boxes taking up one whole wall of same.
The trouble is, I don’t have enough furniture – I need a chest of drawers and maybe a wardrobe for my bedroom and bookshelves for the living room. But I dont’ have the money to buy them at the present time – this is my second fortnight of paying double rent, since I broke the lease on my last place, and all the bills with the connection fees are starting to come in. Ouch.
It’s not that I can’t afford it – but there’s not a lot of extra cash floating around.
That said, I got rid of what extra there was, this last weekend. I was at the Port Adelaide Fisherman’s Markets, at Mel’s stall, and I had a wander around afterwards. Last time I was there, Emma and I found areally nice tea pot that I dithered about, and then decided that I’d go back for. I wanted it for my Birthday do, which is going to be an afternoon tea, of the refined sort. I have been slowly collecting odd cups and saucers, napkins, and the like. Anyway, when we went back it wasn’t there. But this time:

A miraculous reappearance! Not the best photos, but they were last-minute mornign snaps. I’m sure you’ll forgive.

It was only $12, so I bought it, on the theory that if I didn’t, I’d be kicking myself.
Bought with a similar point of view was this:

I’d just walked past a really really nice and perfect mirror for $99, which there is no way in the world I can afford right now. And then there was this, for $10. Snapped up! The astute among you will notice, from the colour of the wall, that it is in the kitchen, and not the hall as I have been scheming. It looked weird there, what with it being my its lonesome, and also saying ‘kitchen’ on it.
Besides, the kitchen is the most together room at the moment.
Check these out:

The far right canisters I have had for a while. The middle ones were bought on the last cousin op shopping trip. They are aluminium and I was originally scared that they might give me brain cancer, but then I decided that if I am going to get brain cancer, I’d rather get it from my canister what I love than from my deoderant, and so I’m using them. But my favourite ones are the ones on the right which are, as Jac points out, Shiny. I bought those at the Fisherman’s Wharf Markets, as a substitute for the teapot, that other time.
See the tags on them? Since some of them are not filled with what they claim to be (third from the left, for example, says ‘tea’ but in fact contains rice) and others are duplicate (three types each of flour and sugar) and I apparently have dementia (hello aluminium canisters) and can’t remember my own name, I labelled them.
I used these:

They are from Print a Day and they are PERFECT. See?


But even this project, simple as it is, is only half done. Yeesh.
I also printed out the list ones of the matrioshkas and also the toadstools (SO EXCITING I LOVE THESE I AM YELLING WHY AM I YELLING?)

SUCH a terrible photo, I do apologise. Also, I need a better magnet. Or maybe I’ll get a clip and a magnet and clip them. Or, I saw a thing on craftzine about making pieces of paper into a pad using special gum or jsut regular glue. Anyway, it’s exciting.
Also exciting is the fact that I am up (down?) to the waist on Sahara. I basted the neckline and tried it on, and it fits. I took some photos because I don’t have a mirror I can see all of myself in, and I needed to look at it.

I’ve since sewn the neck up properly and although I need to redo it because the seam is not very neat, it does sit a bit better than this. I think I shall sew up an inch or two of the split, as well. I knit it a repeat wider than the pattern said, because I was concerned about the fit and if it would stretch accross that opening properly.
As you can see, it does fit. I’m not sure how neatly, though. Here it is without the front sewn up.

The shoulder sit better like this. (ooooh, look at my canisters in the reflection! Hello, shiny canisters!!)
The thing is, usually I do short rows, which would make it sit a bit better. I didn’t on this because 1) where I would do them, there is lace and shaping 2) top down short rows hurt my brain and, most importantly 3) I started doing them, right after neck split bit, but they were really really obvious in this yarn.
I probably should have investigated side dart, but it’s in the round, and I’ve never done it before and, well… it’s HARD. I think it will be ok, although not perfect. You can’t really see it that well here:

Or maybe you can. It’s a good half an inch shorter at the front than at the back.
I am thinking that what I will do is knit it an extra inch longer at the waist, and an inch longer at the bottom. That should account for any undergarment peeping, which is the worst result of my usual hemline dilemma.
Does anyone know any different, or have better advice? I wait with baited breath…
(Can you see my camera in this? Never knew apples could make such a good tripod, now did you?)
I’ve never been meme tagged before. How excitement!
The Science Girl tagged me for six things you didn’t know about me. This is tough because, as she pointed out herself, the longer you blog, the more you share. Plus, most people who read this know me in real life. There isn’t much I won’t blab about, and what I won’t is… well… private. So, I guess that leaves us with the trivial! I’ll try not to be too trivial.
1. I am really weird about texture in food. Anything sort of grainy/squeaky I can’t eat. This means green beans, tofu, oysters, seaweed, some fish (sushi is a nightmare) that kind of thing. I also really hate biting into corriander (cilantro) although I love the flavour of it infused. These two weird issues combined mean that I can’t eat cold rolls unless I make them myself – surprise cilantro? No thanks.
2. I am obsessed with maps. But I am not very good at geography, unless I have a story to go with the place – which is why I was a history major, I guess. I only started to know where things are in Europe once I studied its history. Although, I probably know the map of Reformation era Europe better than today’s Europe – the other day I caught myself wondering if Austria was still a country! (PS, it is)
3. Whenever I am going over a bridge or sitting next to an open bus window, and I have something precious in my hand (iPod, wallet, keys, etc) I have to grip them extra hard because I have this weird urge to throw them over the edge. I cannot express how devastated I would be if I did this.
4. I don’t and have never owned a hairdryer.
5. I love Doris Day. Yes, I do, and I don’t care how ridiculous Calamity Jane is, still love it, and my favourite song it is even ‘A Woman’s Touch’. And that bit where she confronts Katy and Bill shoots the barrel to teach her a lesson and she runs off and Bill comes after her? Makes me cry every time. I’ve felt like that a fair few times. There is nothing you can say to make me not love that move, or Pillow Talk, although you can have Lover Come Back (favourite moment in that? After a big dinner that she cooks for him Rock Hudson: Would you like me to help with the dishes? Doris, with no trace of irony whatsoever: Oh no! That’s woman’s work!)
6. I am straight. But My One True Love was a girl I went to high school with. I know, I know, I was 16 but I really truly did love her, with everything I had. Nothing ever happened – by the time I realised that I was actually able to be In Love, and with a Girl, too, she had moved on. It took me years to get over her properly – Adelaide’s pretty small, and I bump into her every now and then. Last time I was fine, but the time before that I cried every night for a week afterward. I haven’t been in love since, although I have loved people (not in the same way, though, really). I don’t love her anymore, but only because I am so much a different person. The part of me that is still that person, is still 16 (and 17 and 18 and 19 and 20) loves her. Thankfully it’s a pretty small part these days. But if she turned up on my doorstop today, I’d still probably give her anything she asked for. (I don’t mean that, you smutty people)
Ha! Got you with that last one, didn’t I! So much for being trivial. Dear ridiculous-father-figure-deity-in-the-sky, I hope no one I know from then reads this, because they will definitely know who I am talking about, too. Well, whatever. It’s not really a part of who I am anymore except as a fact. (she says, blithely)
And now I am not going to be lame and say ‘whoever wants to can do this meme’ I hereby tag:





